Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 28.06.2025 13:45

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Why is there so much hate against black people?

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Marvel vs. Capcom Fighting Collection June patch notes - EventHubs

Thank you.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Minecraft's "Vibrant Visuals" update finally has a release date - Eurogamer

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Smoking Rates by Country and Gender in 2025 - Visual Capitalist

What’s next?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Caitlyn Jenner’s Israel Pride Parade Visit Disrupted by Iran War Breakout - The Hollywood Reporter

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

What are the methods used for preserving rice straw in China?

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Trump-Musk feud leaves some DOGE staffers worried about their futures: Sources - ABC News

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Just in the last 5 years:

Owen Wilson Brings Clever, Funny “Stick” in Under Par - Roger Ebert

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Russia can stop this any time.

PCIe 7.0 is coming, but not soon, and not for you - The Verge